Monday, December 31, 2012

Happy New Year Folks

Happy 2013 to all PRS-ites who have already celebrated the New Year and for those waiting for the magic hour, all the very best from East Yorkshire.

and a happy New Year... one and all!...

Sunday, December 30, 2012

Whew.. Finally reached the street.. Happy New Year

happy birthday... the 'ampshire lad...have a good one...what's that?...oh you've started already!...but it's only just gone midnight! :))

Friday, December 28, 2012

MR.P's.RODENT !!!!

Sorry Mr.P. such a lovely photo just had to mount it up.You must be so proud of this little fellow. Have a Happy New Year.

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Monday, December 24, 2012

Thursday, December 20, 2012

just in case!...

...see you in Southampton...

One for the golfers....

Ed and Linda met while on a singles cruise and Ed fell head over heels for her. When they discovered they lived in the same city only a few miles apart Ed was ecstatic. He immediately started asking her out when they got home. Within a couple of weeks, Ed had taken Linda to dance clubs, restaurants, concerts, movies, and museums. Ed became convinced that Linda was indeed his soul mate and true love. Every date seemed better than the last.

On the one-month anniversary of their first dinner on the cruise ship, Ed took Linda to a fine restaurant. While having cocktails and waiting for their salad, Ed said, "I guess you can tell I'm very much in love with you. I'd like a little serious talk before our relationship continues to the next stage. So, before I get a box out of my jacket and ask you a life changing question, it's only fair to warn you, since retiring from the police force, I've turned into a total golf nut. I play golf, I read about golf, I watch golf on TV. In short, I eat, sleep, and breathe golf.

If that's going to be a problem for us, you'd better say so now!"
Linda took a deep breath and responded, "Ed, that certainly won't be a problem. I love you as you are and I love golf too; but, since we're being totally honest with each other, you need to know that for the last five years I've been a hooker."

Ed said, "I bet it's because you're not keeping your wrists straight when you hit the ball.

Monday, December 17, 2012

Merry Christmas you All

Happy Christmas PRS Bloggers x

Sunday, December 16, 2012

Quite simply put and frightening.

Do We Have the Courage to Stop This?

IN the harrowing aftermath of the school shooting in Connecticut, one thought wells in my mind: Why can’t we regulate guns as seriously as we do cars?
Damon Winter/The New York Times
Nicholas D. Kristof

On the Ground

Share Your Comments About This Column
Nicholas Kristof addresses reader feedback and posts short takes from his travels.
Go to Columnist Page »

Related in Opinion

Edel Rodriguez

The fundamental reason kids are dying in massacres like this one is not that we have lunatics or criminals — all countries have them — but that we suffer from a political failure to regulate guns.
Children ages 5 to 14 in America are 13 times as likely to be murdered with guns as children in other industrialized countries, according to David Hemenway, a public health specialist at Harvard who has written an excellent book on gun violence.
So let’s treat firearms rationally as the center of a public health crisis that claims one life every 20 minutes. The United States realistically isn’t going to ban guns, but we can take steps to reduce the carnage.
American schoolchildren are protected by building codes that govern stairways and windows. School buses must meet safety standards, and the bus drivers have to pass tests. Cafeteria food is regulated for safety. The only things we seem lax about are the things most likely to kill.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has five pages of regulations about ladders, while federal authorities shrug at serious curbs on firearms. Ladders kill around 300 Americans a year, and guns 30,000.
We even regulate toy guns, by requiring orange tips — but lawmakers don’t have the gumption to stand up to National Rifle Association extremists and regulate real guns as carefully as we do toys. What do we make of the contrast between heroic teachers who stand up to a gunman and craven, feckless politicians who won’t stand up to the N.R.A.?
As one of my Facebook followers wrote after I posted about the shooting, “It is more difficult to adopt a pet than it is to buy a gun.”
Look, I grew up on an Oregon farm where guns were a part of life; and my dad gave me a .22 rifle for my 12th birthday. I understand: shooting is fun! But so is driving, and we accept that we must wear seat belts, use headlights at night, and fill out forms to buy a car. Why can’t we be equally adult about regulating guns?
And don’t say that it won’t make a difference because crazies will always be able to get a gun. We’re not going to eliminate gun deaths, any more than we have eliminated auto accidents. But if we could reduce gun deaths by one-third, that would be 10,000 lives saved annually.
Likewise, don’t bother with the argument that if more people carried guns, they would deter shooters or interrupt them. Mass shooters typically kill themselves or are promptly caught, so it’s hard to see what deterrence would be added by having more people pack heat. There have been few if any cases in the United States in which an ordinary citizen with a gun stopped a mass shooting.
The tragedy isn’t one school shooting, it’s the unceasing toll across our country. More Americans die in gun homicides and suicides in six months than have died in the last 25 years in every terrorist attack and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq combined.
So what can we do? A starting point would be to limit gun purchases to one a month, to curb gun traffickers. Likewise, we should restrict the sale of high-capacity magazines so that a shooter can’t kill as many people without reloading.
We should impose a universal background check for gun buyers, even with private sales. Let’s make serial numbers more difficult to erase, and back California in its effort to require that new handguns imprint a microstamp on each shell so that it can be traced back to a particular gun.
“We’ve endured too many of these tragedies in the past few years,” President Obama noted in a tearful statement on television. He’s right, but the solution isn’t just to mourn the victims — it’s to change our policies. Let’s see leadership on this issue, not just moving speeches.
Other countries offer a road map. In Australia in 1996, a mass killing of 35 people galvanized the nation’s conservative prime minister to ban certain rapid-fire long guns. The “national firearms agreement,” as it was known, led to the buyback of 650,000 guns and to tighter rules for licensing and safe storage of those remaining in public hands.
The law did not end gun ownership in Australia. It reduced the number of firearms in private hands by one-fifth, and they were the kinds most likely to be used in mass shootings.
In the 18 years before the law, Australia suffered 13 mass shootings — but not one in the 14 years after the law took full effect. The murder rate with firearms has dropped by more than 40 percent, according to data compiled by the Harvard Injury Control Research Center, and the suicide rate with firearms has dropped by more than half.
Or we can look north to Canada. It now requires a 28-day waiting period to buy a handgun, and it imposes a clever safeguard: gun buyers should have the support of two people vouching for them.
For that matter, we can look for inspiration at our own history on auto safety. As with guns, some auto deaths are caused by people who break laws or behave irresponsibly. But we don’t shrug and say, “Cars don’t kill people, drunks do.”
Instead, we have required seat belts, air bags, child seats and crash safety standards. We have introduced limited licenses for young drivers and tried to curb the use of mobile phones while driving. All this has reduced America’s traffic fatality rate per mile driven by nearly 90 percent since the 1950s.
Some of you are alive today because of those auto safety regulations. And if we don’t treat guns in the same serious way, some of you and some of your children will die because of our failure.
I invite you to comment on this column on my blog, On the Ground. Please also join me on Facebook and Google+, watch my YouTube videos and follow me on Twitter.
  • Save
  • E-mail
  • Share

Tuesday, December 11, 2012


65 member Russian dance troupe tomorrow 'The Nutcracker' . Temptations Jan.4th.

                                                                   This or THIS Paul
1956 Mk 1 Philips Panda 49cc or as Photographed in Beverley last Sunday, 1968 4.2 E type.

Monday, December 10, 2012

Newsletter photo.

Roger-I have just received my copy of the newsletter and can confirm that your photo is definitely Pat Bishop.It has opened the floodgates in my mind and I can still smell that scarf she is wearing as you may remember the custom was to exchange scarves when one "coupled up ".I really would love to contact her again if only to appologise for my shyness at the time.If anyone has any info on her whereabouts,I would appreciate any help to contact Pat or Lynda.

Sunday, December 09, 2012

H.M.S.Ark Royal 1971-2

Carol & Norm,as promised,here are a few shots of my Ark Royal.Sad to think that the Trade towers were not even completed when we visited, and now they are no more. I must say that the shot of Gibraltar is one of my favourites.[ it usually meant that we were on the way home ].Great days spent with great people,much missed.

Friday, December 07, 2012

Thursday, December 06, 2012

Talking of birthdays

Came across these the other day. Birthday cards I received in 1960 while at PRS. Not sure of all the names but  Top Left, Babs Wallace, Top right, Rosemary ?, Lorna Young, Pat Bishop. Bottom left, Nina Travis. Bottom right, Lallie (Nickname) Innes?

Tuesday, December 04, 2012

Another childhood favourite gone (well the paper verison anyway)

Sunday, December 02, 2012


For those of you who read The Sunday Telegraph (today's edition), look in the Get Up and Go (for the Older and Wiser!) section on page 7 - 'The gift of sight'. This could be the PRS Martin Ashenden who was in Howe from 1953 - 1955. I know he has been located; is anyone in touch with him to ask if it is, in fact, him in the article?